mrwee  Freshman Member

About

Username
mrwee
Joined
Visits
23
Last Active
Roles
Member
Points
200
Badges
6
Posts
37

Comments

  • Hi @mocr. Interesting possible workaround. I'm also still 
struggling getting a viable solution up and running for multicast + mDNS. 
It seems like more and more products are utilizing multicast, so one 
should think there were more solutions out there. Did you test the bonjour-reflector?When
 I search for…
  • 
 Ok, thanks for your reply. This is, needless to say, sad news. Will see what options we have then. Hopefully this will be implemented in the USG range soon :)
  • I think that you can/need to do something specific on the UniFi USG. It just can't match the Zyxel USG110 for me, so I'm really keen on keeping the router. My multicast works across my VLAN's, but mDNS doesn't :( This might be a good help for you, with the UniFi USG:…
  • Fixed! Removed the static VLAN config on GS1920, now it's working :)
  • My subnet on WAN1 is 255.255.255.192, but it's also the only physical WAN connection I've got, so I assume WAN2 is useless in this case. I dont' quite understand your second option, but just for clarification I'd like to map one of my multiple WAN1 IP addresses to the DMZ.
  • You were quite right. I could disable the virtual interface and it works fine. Can't explain why I ever did that, probably lack of knowledge :).Again, thanks for your help
  • The problem is on the WAN side. I have 5 IP addresses on the same fiber, and I use both NAT + outbound routing for different services. From what I've seen, additional WAN IP addresses needs to be added as virtual WAN ports "under" WAN1.
  • This would be very useful. It's now the third time I really could have used this and there doesn't seem to be any practical workarounds.
  • @Zyxel_Charlie Thanks for your prompt reply. Will test it out asap.
  • I am on the same firmware version on a USG 110, and also experience slow VPN throughput. Is there a patch available? Checking for an update under Firmware Manager, shows no updates available.
  • Ok, thanks for the clarification. I still haven't got it working, but I'll try to troubleshoot it.
  • Thank you. This looks very useful. In trying to make this work, I've fiddled with "Use Policy Route to Security control dynamic IPSec rules". Is it correctly understood that if this is enabled, then no Policies needs to be configured manually? Even if I use Policy Routing (Under network)? Thanks for your support, it's…
  • Hi Mark. Thanks for you reply. In that case I get the speed that I should. I might go and see if I can find a similar grade product with more throughput then. Alternatively a bigger USG. It seems like waste of unused bandwidth right now..
Avatar