n_j  Freshman Member

The goal is to use WPA Enterprise authentication for wifi, via a secure TCP/TLC to a SaaS radius service. To eliminate the need for internal PKI/radius infrastructure (and VPN tunnels to access that) for remote "intenet only" sites. E.g. to authenticate AzureAD joined computers. So both APs and Nebula need to support this…

Please Zyxel, compare the ATP100 and USGFLEX100 besides the bundled license. If hardware the same? Seems ATP has a bit better performance. ATP100 bundle incl 1Y Gold is cheaper than USGFLEX100 (hw only)+1Y Gold. I think ATP is an older model that USGFLEX. Right/wrong? So maybe ATP will EOL before USGFLEX? Any difference…

Does this mean that if I have an USG FLEX 100 running a bundled 1Y UTM license, and I then purchase and activate a 1Y GOLD license, I will get the remaining period of UTM license upgraded to Gold ?

My request was to authenticate wifi users by Azure AD. That somehow WPA Enterprise with "Nebula Cloud authentication" could pass the auth request to Azure AD via SAML. I do not want to maintain a userdatabase in Nebual itself. The use case is this: Having a lot of small offices only conencted to internet, it is not…

The case is to gain insight. Having client computers moving between sites, to know how they are connected (wired, SSID) and where.