Comments
-
The wiring should be okay. Until last month i did have a wired connection thorugh a fritzbox and dedicated switch and now, since a month, i have a complete ubiquity setup with two usw-pro switches, fiber backbone inside my house and so on. Of course i have a wired connection. I agree with your writing, that the memory…
-
Hello Again. I managed to take a look at the other NAS326 and this behaves completely normal. The difference to my NAS is that this NAS does not make a JBOD from it's to hard drives. Also the drive Usage is something around 50% and the write performance over network is ~100MB/s My NAS however never had a a write…
-
I sold the switch because it didn't fit that nice in my ubiquity setup. But i wrote you a PM with the data. I don't know which behavior the leds had, but i pressed the front reset really long. (approximately 30 seconds) and after that it felt like the switch performs the reset, but it didn't… ;)
-
@Mijzelf I completly agree with you. I didn't change the backup program. I just use windows explorer to copy the file by myself. e2freefrag is not available at the nas326 but e2fsck told something about 1-2% of fragmented data after cleaning the drive. I do have another nas326 at a customers side. Maybe i can take a look…
-
Okay, after doing e2fsck -y 3 times i decided to doing a e2fsck without -y and let it delete the 3 files (as this are backup files i am able to copy it again) so i pressed n at the step where it asked if it should clone the files and after that e2fsck was able to regenerate the fs completly. Running e2fsck again after that…
-
Short interim report e2fsck /dev/mapper/vg_cae2ed9e-lv_b3f36ee7 works since several ours after e2fsck -p said that there are "/dev/mapper/vg_cae2ed9e-lv_b3f36ee7: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. (i.e., without -a or -p options)" This check found severals multiply-claimed blocks but and pass 1D was running for…
-
Thanks. Will try this today afternoon and come back with the result. Regards Thomas
-
Thanks for your answer. I did a reboot this morning and copied some data. Afterwards i did a dmesg. Because i don't want to delete anything i pasted it here: I found the following lines interesting: Line 152: Bad block table found at page 131008, version 0x01 Bad block table found at page 130944, version 0x01…
-
Hello This is a screenshot from top when the system is in idle. Even there i see smbd -D. Question is why?
-
I made this screenshot in the moment of copying the data. SMART values seems to be ok..
-
Thanks for your answer I managed to reset the switch correctly after using the reset button on the right side… Don't know why, but with this button reset works perfect and i was able to get into the web interface…..