Comments
-
Hello @Zyxel_Kay Yes, I have terminated any other active session. The switches located in remote buildings that not commissioning yet (no local employees) and I am single network user who knows the IP addresses and uses these.
-
Hello @Zyxel_Kay PC (192.168.88.242) <=cable=> (Router 192.168.88.1) <= I-net (VPN_1) => (Router 10.1.16.1) <=cable=> Zyxel switch (10.1.16.6) PC (192.168.88.242) <=cable=> (Router 192.168.88.1) <= I-net (VPN_2) => (Router 10.2.16.1) <=cable=> Zyxel switch (10.2.16.6) ping 10.1.16.6 (from 192.168.88.242) Pinging 10.1.16.6…
-
@Zyxel_Kay Yes, traffic routing is allowed between these subnets and no limits about protocols. The network switch responds on ping requests as well. The 2nd Test indicates that HTTP protocol works as well once it can recognize that Web GUI already has been opened by 1st computer (Test 1).
-
@mMontana Yes, default gateway had been configured. Snapshot of configuration has been deleted in the 1st post.
-
The Test 2 was accomplished in addition to Test 1 just to show that telecommunication persists between network switch and computer (in the Test 1). The main test is Test 1 - I am able to reach Web management of network switch from the same IP subnet but cannot to reach from other IP subnets.
