mMontana  Guru Member

"Vulnerability fix" is understandable. Full disclosures might be source of issues, but please… At least state some ETA for the disclosure! Consider that for some safety/privacy procedures, lacking of the minimal information for assess the risk might lead to a delay for this version adoption!

I'm not laughing, because release notes are not funny at all. Not even a ETA for full disclosure?

Where is the security advisory and announcements for 5.39P1 firmware?

Obsolete spec. @PeterUK two groups to update instead of one if you're using a zyshell script to update a service check; if things goes south, two security policies instead of one. And different scripts for any "obsolete spec" device.

Sorry for the late reply (please, reinstate the capability quote of messages!) > Due to the segmentation of device specifications, we cannot enlarge it. So this is a designed limitation? I can understand older devices could have memory issues, but I'm referring to the Zywall 5 era, or the first generation of USG (ZLD…

@Zyxel_Kay thanks for the detailed answer. If configured via ZON utility, do not allow disabling the default profile/SSID makes some sense, however… If i'm accessing from wireless network instead from cabled interface make more sens to provide a costrain nor a warning before apply the setting change (disable the only…

I cannot agree more. Capability to unlock that view in some role might be useful in some scenarios.

Hi, thanks for your answer. At present, SSID1 cannot be disabled within the setup wizard interface and is configured to remain active by default. T Question remains, the only one reported into my post: why? Default configuration for the zyxel aPs are "no security as default" and nowadays, it's not a good idea. In EU…

I cannot agree more.

UP! As far as i can see, ZLD 5.39 has been delivered with… 20150921 GeoIP database into firmware. I'm expecting at least than is updated the IP table within any firmware new release…

You can. There's a link in the thread. Try to click it. But really… I'd not use USG 100 device nowadays. Latest firmware is 8 years old, so "security" currently is not a thing on that device.

Hi @AlexandervW would you kindly share which model of device you're using?

@xsentinel hi, at the end of the migration/replacement of USG40, if you're willing to share, I'd love to read info, nice things and complicated one from your experience.

IMVHO currently Flex H is not "on par" as features with Flex series. It's important to verify if Flex H will satisfy any of the services provided by current device. Also… Flex series is local and cloud; both paths are available with slight differences between the two admin modalities. Flex H seems a lot "Nebula first", so…

The notice is still bizzare and useless, also than out of target. And due current necessities and budget choices, the match between older and current device has the one reported in the first post, not in the supposed answer. Which currently is not that useful.