mlik  Freshman Member

I'm a bit confused, maybe it's a translator issue. In that case, a simple solution is to unblock ports 500, 4500 in geo ip. I suspect a danger related to allowing access, but there are certificates, logins and passwords? By the way, how do you create this type of rule?

I'm surprised there's no other option. After all, the device that connects as a client has its own identifier, e.g. in the form of a certificate, login, password for the VPN connection. The firewall knows what kind of device it is and I'm surprised that you can't add such a device as an exception.

I won't know the WAN address because it will change. I thought about the local address assigned when the client connects to the site. That's my mistake. So what remains is to use DDNS and pass the name for the appropriate ports? Is this your practice in such situations? DDNS for iPhone, Mac and Laptop, I can't imagine this…

it is known that the client will have an IP address set by me. Is it not possible to configure the firewall so that it does not include specific addresses for geo ip? I do not want to play with DDNS.

When I configuring WiFi, i was set the basic parameters: network name, security, output interface. Rest the configuration is default. I don't know if you meant these parameters: Band mode: 2.4G802.11 ban: 11b/g/nChannel width: 20MHzChannel selection: DCSOutput power: 30dBmDCS Client Aware enabled2.4Ghz channel selection:…

The client had 2 network adapters in the computer and there were 2 active connections. Routing problem. Removing the gateway from one connection resolved the problem. Thank you for your answer. I also followed your advice and disabled the LAN2 interface in POINT2 and changed its default address.

Now that I thought about it, I'm more interested in creating a Site-to-site tunneled connection to LAN 2 VPN. VPN currently works between LAN1-LAN1 networks. If I create a VPN Site to Site connection between LAN1 (192.168.1.0) and LAN2 (192.168.2.0). The connection will work, but only one way: from step 2 to 1 EDIT: I…

The topic from the first post is back. Today there is no internet point. As you can see, the update did not help to solve the problem. Surely, if he permanently enters the WAN address, the internet will return. I connected to the router and the WAN interface at DHCP got the strange address 10.10.10.29. Changing the address…

It may surprise you, but I didn't know about this feature. Despite everything, thanks for the hint.

Today I updated the router with which I started the thread on the forum. The update went smoothly. As for the second rotuer - I suppose I must have lost my way at some point. The update is ok. Thank you very much mMontana for your help. Sorry, but I'm a novice user.

I have concerns about the latest firmware version. Today I installed the same USG20W-VPN router with version V4.33 (ABAR.0). Before configuration, I updated the router to 4.64 (ABAR.0) - the oldest available on the website. Then to 4.65 (ABAR.1). After setting up PPPoE, I set the IP address to LAN1 - 192.168.100.100 and…

Yes, sorry this is the USG20W-VPN. Do you think that firmware update may be important here? There is some simple setting that I could have skipped? example forward wan to wan_ppp?

i have version: V4.33(ABAR.0) / 2019-01-09 17:32:53 I did not update

Do you know why I ask? There are a lot of network devices on every shop - payment terminals, internet services, etc. It must work well. That is why it is important to me how much the speed of the Internet will drop?

OK I understand. How significantly the speed of the Internet will decrease after creating this type of VPN connection. And, Am I able to do it on the USG20W-VPN model?