Comments
-
How old is the device? It's installed in dusty or moist environment? As a "stupid" test for avoid some pranks, put a piece of tape on the reset buttons, you should see if is punctured or removed for reapply after the reset.
-
UP! Again In 5 months this post has not been updated. Currently Flex H Series is delivering v1.20 of firmware. Status must have been changed on some way. Please, update the list.
-
Was manually reset ever? It's a tiny possibility but… also reset buttons break, from time to time.
-
According to this release from Microsoft… Is KB5036893 installed? Or Preview update of the end of april? (Windows 10 is affected too, with the equivalent KB5036892)
-
Dust off insides of the unit. Try with a more recent power supply (a switching one with 50% more amperage shoult not be an issue).
-
Sorry for being picky. It's a "pure IPSec" connection or an L2TP/IPsec connection between samsun phone and USG60? (which by the way is out of support but whatever…)
-
If you have any question or… explaination, feel free to ask
-
I can understand the underlying logic. However, without documentation readout or your explaination, I could not be sure if WPA3 setting into WebUI could allow (or not) WPA2 working at the same time. I don't know if one more option can be setup into future versions. WPA3 ⇒ ONLY WPA3 WPA3-mix ⇒ like current one. Fun fact:…
-
I'd love to reserve for a specific tunnel (6 are built, with different gateways) enough bandwidth to have stable dehaviour. If not possible the single tunnel, at least the gateway.
-
@PeterUK thanks for correcting me.
-
On "not nebula devices" If i need to connect one than more subnet i create more connections on the same gateway. Site 1: 192.168.10.0/24, 192.168.11.0/24 Site 2: 192.168.1.0/24, 192.168.6.0/24 on both sides, only one gateway for site. Site 1: connection from 192.168.10.0/24 to 192.168.1.0/24, from 192.168.10.0/24 to…
-
172.16.0.0/12 it's really a strange subnet. AFAIK class B is 172.16.0.0/16, so /12 is 16 times bigger space than B class subnet . And overlaps public addresses. Probably there's some reasoning and specific architecture behind that… But with these information I cannot figure it out what could be.
-
I'm sorry, @DW_Informatica, but i cannot exactly understand this part of your post. My local lan is 192.168.1.0/24 , in the vpn settings the Local Policy is 10.9.230.144/29 and the Remote Policy is 172.16.0.0/12 AFAIK, local and remote policy must be the same otherwise things can't work. So… You know the "real" remote…
-
Bump up. This topic can't be answered. 5 months has passed, any improvement from this status?