Line2 
Freshman Member
評論
-
Good to hear you also moved to OSPF. It seems not to be widespreaded at ZyXEL customers. I waited for a long time for OSPF/VTI. Line2
-
Hi We use central logging for a lot of sites (over VTI/IPSec) with no problems yet. How does your policy routes on the branch USGs look like? We use OSPF for routing not policy routing. Maybe try a static route on the branch USGs to the Head office. Line2
-
VTI MTU 1490 seems quite high for me. For VTI/IPsec (AES128, SHA256, DH14) we normaly use MTU 1400
-
is this a duplicate to this very old one from 2017?https://businessforum.zyxel.com/discussion/634/virtual-zywall#latest
-
at least DH19 in near future?
-
about 6months later, any news on that?
-
we use OSPF on VTI/IPSec on ZyWALL. That's possible since about ZLD 4.30. OSPF on GRE is not possible on ZyWALLs (other feature request). Or do I have misunderstood your request?
-
we can hope (as we have done already for 7months)
-
I support this idea too and would extend it by LLDP neighbor info.OID: 1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1
-
I can also support this feature request. The possibility to read by SNMP the switch forwarding db and the LLDP neighbours
-
maybe you see another process using CPU with 'debug system ps'
-
I see most of time with very little traffic and a few site2site tunnels about 20% CPU on an USG110. On CLI 'debug system ps' shows here 17% CPU used by snmpd.
-
I have a confirmed bug reported about 2years ago, not fixed yet. So only hope can help.
-
Hi @Alfonso Thanks for your support. Was ever a point of the idea area here implemented? Let's hope.
-
ok, thank you.
