HMS  Freshman Member

It is unfortunate that this problem is still not solved. We bought an ATP500 at the end of 2018, which we still can not put into service because of this lack of the LAG function.

Hello and thank you for your answer.Indeed, we currently have a USG310 cluster that works perfectly this way.We also have a USG110 cluster (which is not Full HA) that we want to replace with an ATP500 cluster configured in the same way as our USG310 cluster. Thank you in advance for sharing our need for the LAG function…

Hello, What I mean by FULL HA Cluster:2 ATP operating in HA-Pro + 2 Stacked switches on WAN side + 2 Stacked switches on LAN side. The LAG function is necessarily necessary in this case. With best regards.

Hello and thank you for your answer. The ATP devices are the successors of the USG, it seems logical to me a feature available in an old model, also on a new model ... If not, how to create a Full-HA cluster with ATP without this feature? With best regards.

To reproduce the problem, it's simple:-1 Functional HA-Pro Cluster (1 Active, 1 Passive)-1 Remote Desktop Server in the LAN-1 PC WAN side, connected to the remote desktop serverFrom the PC, you will be regularly disconnected / reconnected from the Remote Desktop session. Completely Disconnect (Unplug the Power) the Cluster…

Hello and thank you for your answer.Unfortunately, the XGS4600 Series and XGS3700 Series switches only have 4 10GB ports. Which is not enough. Our 4 servers each have 4 10GBits ports.2 ports per server would be connected to a 10GBits Switch. The other 2 ports connected to a second 10GB switch.2 ports per switch would be…