WJS 
Freshman Member
Comments
-
Do you mean application didn't pop up so there's no way to authenticate ? When the program is running, icon will be displayed on the top bar.
-
Will it work if only connected to wan2 (dongle) ?
-
Never tried that. then in my opinion, Due to security issue. Firewall shouldn't allow the session for a long time. For the reconnect automatically, I suppose "AutoIt" may reach the inquiry. maybe is worth a try.
-
I think your firewall doesn't have internet access. I have the same issue when I inactive the wan interface..
-
Any log on Flex500 ? Did you upgrade the frimware to 5.30
-
Still believe it's hard to implement by URL...or I didn't figure it out.. Eventually nas1/nas2.zyxel.com would resolve to IP addresses then do the DNAT. In order to reach the inquiry ("Load Sharing Between 2 Server). I think the following diagram should be reachable 1) NS (Name Server) Should point Firewall , nas.zyxel.com…
-
Make ge11 / ge12 as the same Port Group. And using Policy Based routing to determine outbound traffic . (Just thinking :) , for you reference.)
-
If your topology like zyman2008 said,I think there are some point to notice 1) ensure DHCP Pool of mikrotik won't conflict with ATP. 2) if mikrotik didn't do NAT,ATP must have route to DHCP Pool 3) If mikrotik would share the same ISP link , mikrotik shall set 10.0.0.1 as default route.
-
In order to check whether ICMP request reachable . You can perform CLI on ubuntu. tcpdump -nnvi [interface] icmp. It seem the traffic shall pass through site2 correctly .Site3 is the last node we might check
-
Does Site3(Ubuntu) recevie ICMP request from Site 1 ? Could you capture packet on site3 ?
-
Agree PeterUK, Could you post layout IP?
-
"Interface type" have different meanings. Have you change the "OPT" interface type to "external"？
-
Here are CentOS (without GUI) L2TP over IPsec post before. https://community.zyxel.com/en/discussion/comment/37356#Comment_37356 Maybe you can try that.
-
Like PeterUK saied. Just use Expert mode to setup AP.
-
Although Zyxel does not support the feature, If provider A, B support route-map . You can use it to restrict the Route table which learned from other BGP member. I have the same issue before. It would work .
