Line2  Freshman Member

Good to hear you also moved to OSPF. It seems not to be widespreaded at ZyXEL customers. I waited for a long time for OSPF/VTI. Line2

Hi We use central logging for a lot of sites (over VTI/IPSec) with no problems yet. How does your policy routes on the branch USGs look like? We use OSPF for routing not policy routing. Maybe try a static route on the branch USGs to the Head office. Line2

VTI MTU 1490 seems quite high for me. For VTI/IPsec (AES128, SHA256, DH14) we normaly use MTU 1400

is this a duplicate to this very old one from 2017?https://businessforum.zyxel.com/discussion/634/virtual-zywall#latest

at least DH19 in near future?

about 6months later, any news on that?

we use OSPF on VTI/IPSec on ZyWALL. That's possible since about ZLD 4.30. OSPF on GRE is not possible on ZyWALLs (other feature request). Or do I have misunderstood your request?

we can hope (as we have done already for 7months)

I support this idea too and would extend it by LLDP neighbor info.OID: 1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1

I can also support this feature request. The possibility to read by SNMP the switch forwarding db and the LLDP neighbours

maybe you see another process using CPU with 'debug system ps'

I see most of time with very little traffic and a few site2site tunnels about 20% CPU on an USG110. On CLI 'debug system ps' shows here 17% CPU used by snmpd.

I have a confirmed bug reported about 2years ago, not fixed yet. So only hope can help.

Hi @Alfonso Thanks for your support. Was ever a point of the idea area here implemented? Let's hope.

ok, thank you.