Is QUIC protocol still a security concern?
I've ridden that QUIC protocol developed by google, can be a security risk because is not recognized as web traffic by the firewall (usg 210) and then not filtered correctly.
https://www.fastvue.co/fastvue/blog/googles-quic-protocols-security-and-reporting-implications/
The issue is still current?
In order to prevent I currently use a security policy, which block/deny outgoing traffic from LAN to WAN, on port UDP 443
Thank you for your support
0
All Replies
-
As I study for year still now.
I cannot find firewall on the market that claim it can identify the web request via QUIC protocol.
Look like the current work-around is using firewall rule to block UDP destination port 443 to force Chorme to go for standard HTTP protocol.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 347 Beta Program
- 2.1K Nebula
- 115 Nebula Ideas
- 77 Nebula Status and Incidents
- 5K Security
- 44 USG FLEX H Series
- 246 Security Ideas
- 1.2K Switch
- 64 Switch Ideas
- 900 WirelessLAN
- 33 WLAN Ideas
- 5.8K Consumer Product
- 204 Service & License
- 326 News and Release
- 71 Security Advisories
- 21 Education Center
- 5 [Campaign] Zyxel Network Detective
- 1.8K FAQ
- 832 Nebula FAQ
- 402 Security FAQ
- 219 Switch FAQ
- 190 WirelessLAN FAQ
- 45 Consumer Product FAQ
- 136 Service & License FAQ
- 34 Documents
- 34 Nebula Monthly Express
- 71 About Community
- 61 Security Highlight