Trouble setting up L2TP over IPSEC on ATP100
All Replies
-
See how you've made an impact in Zyxel Community this year!
0 -
Hi Jeff
I was wondering what happened. Then today I found your message from October 11 on a different page than we were before, and there has been no "Zyxel_Jeff sent you a message" email about it in my inbox. I don't understand what info you are missing. In the private message I uploaded on October 10 I provided the public IP address and complete login information. What else do you need?
0 -
Hi @Starteam
I provide a guide about how to configure remote Web GUI to us again, please check your inbox, thanks.See how you've made an impact in Zyxel Community this year!
0 -
Hi @StarteamNot sure if you already received our notification e-mail from your registered e-mail inbox, because it probably be considered a spam e-mail for your e-mail server. you can check your Zyxel forum in-box on the top right corner as well, as below:
Thanks.See how you've made an impact in Zyxel Community this year!
0 -
Hi @Starteam
Moreover, may I know which VNC server and client software and its version you are using it? Maybe I can try it at our lab as well, thanks.See how you've made an impact in Zyxel Community this year!
0 -
Hi @Starteam
I set up a simple test at our lab as below:
(WAN:10.214.48.135) L2TP client(192.168.50.1) -> (WAN:10.214.48.25)USG Flex200(with V5.31 FW) -> LAN1->PC Ultra VNC server(192.168.1.121)
Firstly, I confirmed the L2TP client already connected to USG Flex200.
Then I tried to establish an UltraVNC connection from L2TP client(192.168.50.1) to LAN1 PC(192.168.1.121) with port 5900.
And I could access my LAN1 PC successfully.
I tried to capture the packet and filter the IP address via Wireshark CLI "ip.addr==192.168.50.1" and confirmed the UltraVNC connection can be established via an L2TP connection.
Thanks.
See how you've made an impact in Zyxel Community this year!
0 -
Hi @Starteam
In addition, I also set up a simple lab and noticed the TightVNC connection can be established via L2TP connection as well.
Topology:(WAN:10.214.48.135) L2TP client(192.168.50.1) -> (WAN:10.214.48.25)USG Flex200(with V5.31 FW) -> LAN1->PC with TightVNC server(192.168.1.121)Firstly, I confirmed the L2TP client is already connected to USG Flex200.Then I tried to establish a TightVNC connection from L2TP client(192.168.50.1) to LAN1 PC(192.168.1.121).And I could access my LAN1 TightVNC server successfully as below:I captured the packet on LAN1 PC and filter the IP address via Wireshark CLI "ip.addr==192.168.50.1" and then confirmed the TightVNC connection can be established via an L2TP connection as well.Thanks .See how you've made an impact in Zyxel Community this year!
0 -
Hi @Starteam
When we disabled the policy route and everything is solved eventually. We consider you won't add this policy route for L2TP clients.
We can ping and access the internal TightVNC server(192.168.1.37) successfully.
CLI: packet-trace interface lan1 ip-proto icmp
Thanks .
See how you've made an impact in Zyxel Community this year!
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 415 Beta Program
- 2.4K Nebula
- 146 Nebula Ideas
- 96 Nebula Status and Incidents
- 5.7K Security
- 250 USG FLEX H Series
- 269 Security Ideas
- 1.4K Switch
- 72 Switch Ideas
- 1.1K Wireless
- 40 Wireless Ideas
- 6.4K Consumer Product
- 249 Service & License
- 386 News and Release
- 84 Security Advisories
- 29 Education Center
- 10 [Campaign] Zyxel Network Detective
- 3.5K FAQ
- 34 Documents
- 34 Nebula Monthly Express
- 85 About Community
- 73 Security Highlight