Workaround for max. 4 virtual WAN interfaces on USG 110
Best Answers
-
Lets take the IP on virtual interface wan1:1
If you make a routing rule say:
incoming Interface
member lan1
source IP 192.168.1.240
next hop Interface
Interface wan1
source network address translation the wan1:1 IP
But if you remove the virtual interface wan1:1 this routing rule should still work?
5 -
You were quite right. I could disable the virtual interface and it works fine. Can't explain why I ever did that, probably lack of knowledge
.
Again, thanks for your help0
All Replies
-
Don't have my own subnet to play around with but surely you can do a network without virtual interfaces?
Without virtual interfaces IP traffic of your subnet is sent to WAN1? You can SNAT without virtual interfaces of a IP.
1 -
The problem is on the WAN side. I have 5 IP addresses on the same fiber, and I use both NAT + outbound routing for different services. From what I've seen, additional WAN IP addresses needs to be added as virtual WAN ports "under" WAN1.
0 -
Lets take the IP on virtual interface wan1:1
If you make a routing rule say:
incoming Interface
member lan1
source IP 192.168.1.240
next hop Interface
Interface wan1
source network address translation the wan1:1 IP
But if you remove the virtual interface wan1:1 this routing rule should still work?
5 -
You were quite right. I could disable the virtual interface and it works fine. Can't explain why I ever did that, probably lack of knowledge
.
Again, thanks for your help0
Categories
- All Categories
- 435 Beta Program
- 2.7K Nebula
- 176 Nebula Ideas
- 117 Nebula Status and Incidents
- 6.1K Security
- 426 USG FLEX H Series
- 298 Security Ideas
- 1.6K Switch
- 78 Switch Ideas
- 1.2K Wireless
- 44 Wireless Ideas
- 6.7K Consumer Product
- 274 Service & License
- 419 News and Release
- 88 Security Advisories
- 31 Education Center
- 10 [Campaign] Zyxel Network Detective
- 4.2K FAQ
- 34 Documents
- 34 Nebula Monthly Express
- 83 About Community
- 89 Security Highlight