Workaround for max. 4 virtual WAN interfaces on USG 110
Best Answers
-
Lets take the IP on virtual interface wan1:1
If you make a routing rule say:
incoming Interface
member lan1
source IP 192.168.1.240
next hop Interface
Interface wan1
source network address translation the wan1:1 IP
But if you remove the virtual interface wan1:1 this routing rule should still work?
5 -
You were quite right. I could disable the virtual interface and it works fine. Can't explain why I ever did that, probably lack of knowledge
.
Again, thanks for your help0
All Replies
-
Don't have my own subnet to play around with but surely you can do a network without virtual interfaces?
Without virtual interfaces IP traffic of your subnet is sent to WAN1? You can SNAT without virtual interfaces of a IP.
1 -
The problem is on the WAN side. I have 5 IP addresses on the same fiber, and I use both NAT + outbound routing for different services. From what I've seen, additional WAN IP addresses needs to be added as virtual WAN ports "under" WAN1.
0 -
Lets take the IP on virtual interface wan1:1
If you make a routing rule say:
incoming Interface
member lan1
source IP 192.168.1.240
next hop Interface
Interface wan1
source network address translation the wan1:1 IP
But if you remove the virtual interface wan1:1 this routing rule should still work?
5 -
You were quite right. I could disable the virtual interface and it works fine. Can't explain why I ever did that, probably lack of knowledge
.
Again, thanks for your help0
Categories
- All Categories
- 431 Beta Program
- 2.6K Nebula
- 164 Nebula Ideas
- 112 Nebula Status and Incidents
- 6K Security
- 364 USG FLEX H Series
- 292 Security Ideas
- 1.5K Switch
- 78 Switch Ideas
- 1.2K Wireless
- 42 Wireless Ideas
- 6.6K Consumer Product
- 262 Service & License
- 407 News and Release
- 87 Security Advisories
- 31 Education Center
- 10 [Campaign] Zyxel Network Detective
- 3.9K FAQ
- 34 Documents
- 34 Nebula Monthly Express
- 85 About Community
- 83 Security Highlight