Doubt implementation.
All Replies
-
Looking at it again its just not possible for even a ugly hack for FTP to be done like this.
When you DNS to like 8.8.8.8 you find the IP then you do TCP but in that TCP session the client never says I'm going to this domain just the IP. The only way a hack could be done is if the client does DNS to the APT then the APT sees it wants nas1.zyxel.com and NAT to 192.168.0.10 per given source IP that did the DNS.
0 -
Still believe it's hard to implement by URL...or I didn't figure it out..
Eventually nas1/nas2.zyxel.com would resolve to IP addresses then do the DNAT.
In order to reach the inquiry ("Load Sharing Between 2 Server). I think the following diagram should be reachable
1) NS (Name Server) Should point Firewall , nas.zyxel.com would response 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2 Round Robin.
2) Set the Virtual Server Load Balancer NAT in Firewall (from WAN1, Real server 192.168.0.10,20 ; from WAN2,Real server 192.168.0.10,20)0
Categories
- All Categories
- 347 Beta Program
- 2.1K Nebula
- 114 Nebula Ideas
- 77 Nebula Status and Incidents
- 5K Security
- 44 USG FLEX H Series
- 246 Security Ideas
- 1.2K Switch
- 65 Switch Ideas
- 901 WirelessLAN
- 33 WLAN Ideas
- 5.8K Consumer Product
- 204 Service & License
- 326 News and Release
- 71 Security Advisories
- 21 Education Center
- 5 [Campaign] Zyxel Network Detective
- 1.8K FAQ
- 831 Nebula FAQ
- 401 Security FAQ
- 219 Switch FAQ
- 190 WirelessLAN FAQ
- 45 Consumer Product FAQ
- 136 Service & License FAQ
- 34 Documents
- 34 Nebula Monthly Express
- 71 About Community
- 61 Security Highlight