Question about switch and load balancing
Hallo,
I have a more general question regarding network configuration, independent of a specific switch model:
As part of upgrading my network to a fiber-optic internet connection, I’m planning the following structure:
Network Setup:
Router (1x 2.5 Gbps + 4x 1 Gbps LAN ports) (Standard Router aka Fritzbox 5590 Fiber)
↓
Switch (with at least 4x SFP+ ports)
↓
Additional switches
Objective:
All LAN ports of the router (1x 2.5 Gbps + 4x 1 Gbps) should ideally be connected to the first switch to utilize the available bandwidth efficiently. From there, the network load should be distributed via the SFP+ ports to downstream switches.
Question:
Does a switch (e.g., from Zyxel) support the ability to perform some kind of load balancing at its inputs—i.e., the combined use of multiple physical ports from the router—and dynamically distribute the resulting network load across several downstream switches?
My question concerns the general feasibility of such a setup—particularly without considering a dedicated high-end model.
Accepted Solution
-
Hi @Montland
XMG1915 supports link aggregation (LACP/LAG), which has a load-sharing property, but not load-balancing. It will increase the bandwidth and allow each client to use a different link as much as possible for transmission, according to the criteria/algorithm.
For more details, please reference this FAQ: Tutorial of Switch Link Aggregation (V4.80) — Zyxel Community
Zyxel Melen0
All Replies
-
In short no.
Also the Fritzbox 5590 2.5Gb port is WAN Edit so it can be set to LAN
so your device will be by 1Gb ports so if your speed your ISP sets for you is 2Gb by Fiber any device will max out at 940Mb0 -
Hi @Montland
XMG1915 supports link aggregation (LACP/LAG), which has a load-sharing property, but not load-balancing. It will increase the bandwidth and allow each client to use a different link as much as possible for transmission, according to the criteria/algorithm.
For more details, please reference this FAQ: Tutorial of Switch Link Aggregation (V4.80) — Zyxel Community
Zyxel Melen0 -
Hello PeterUK,
hello Melen,Thank you very much for your feedback. In fact, I already have an idea of how the whole setup could be implemented using a Zyxel switch.
However, one point stood out to me during my considerations: Despite the impressive bandwidths that can be achieved with Zyxel devices in a home network, the real bottleneck currently lies with the internet service provider’s router. At present, it simply isn't capable of efficiently transferring the full fiber-optic bandwidth into the home network. As a result, we're still struggling with a limitation to 1 Gbit/s – hard to believe, considering the technology that is available.
cu Richard
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 435 Beta Program
- 2.7K Nebula
- 183 Nebula Ideas
- 120 Nebula Status and Incidents
- 6.2K Security
- 438 USG FLEX H Series
- 299 Security Ideas
- 1.6K Switch
- 80 Switch Ideas
- 1.2K Wireless
- 44 Wireless Ideas
- 6.7K Consumer Product
- 276 Service & License
- 433 News and Release
- 88 Security Advisories
- 31 Education Center
- 10 [Campaign] Zyxel Network Detective
- 4.2K FAQ
- 34 Documents
- 34 Nebula Monthly Express
- 84 About Community
- 91 Security Highlight