NAS 542 raid 5 volume down
All Replies
-
A brief update of my progress - 37,76% completed[A ipos: 1133 GB, non-trimmed: 0 B, current rate: 2621 kB/s
opos: 1133 GB, non-scraped: 0 B, average rate: 1644 kB/s
non-tried: 1867 GB, bad-sector: 0 B, error rate: 0 B/s
rescued: 1133 GB, bad areas: 0, run time: 7d 23h 27m
pct rescued: 37.76%, read errors: 0, remaining time: 14d 18h 29m
time since last successful read: 0s
Copying non-tried blocks... Pass 1 (forwards)
0 -
Striking is that, although the speed is horrible (1.6MB/sec on average, while the disk should be able to do 160MB/sec), ddrescue still hasn't found any really unreadable sector.
0 -
Now at 84,2% and a few read errors found;ipos: 2527 GB, non-trimmed: 585728 B, current rate: 2097 kB/s
opos: 2527 GB, non-scraped: 0 B, average rate: 1723 kB/s
non-tried: 473997 MB, bad-sector: 0 B, error rate: 0 B/s
rescued: 2526 GB, bad areas: 0, run time: 16d 23h 19m
pct rescued: 84.20%, read errors: 14, remaining time: 3d 4h 32m
time since last successful read: 0s
Copying non-tried blocks... Pass 1 (forwards)0 -
@Mijzelf whats your thoughts?
Now it is scraping failed blocks... and that seems to be very time consuming;100 kB took about 1 hour.What to do? Consider it done, or keep it going?ipos: 1502 GB, non-trimmed: 0 B, current rate: 132 B/s
opos: 1502 GB, non-scraped: 40887 kB, average rate: 1598 kB/s
non-tried: 0 B, bad-sector: 1143 kB, error rate: 16 B/s
rescued: 3000 GB, bad areas: 2233, run time: 21d 17h 20m
pct rescued: 99.99%, read errors: 3635, remaining time: 16h 36m
time since last successful read: 0s
Trimming failed blocks... (forwards)ipos: 1500 GB, non-trimmed: 0 B, current rate: 0 B/s
opos: 1500 GB, non-scraped: 40787 kB, average rate: 1595 kB/s
non-tried: 0 B, bad-sector: 1222 kB, error rate: 18 B/s
rescued: 3000 GB, bad areas: 2235, run time: 21d 18h 22m
pct rescued: 99.99%, read errors: 3790, remaining time: 59d 13m
time since last successful read: 2m 55s
Scraping failed blocks... (forwards)
0 -
There are 40MB non-scraped sectors left. On a 2TB filesystem that is 0.002%. According to e2fsck/dev/md2: 97078/274325504 files (3.5% non-contiguous), 1096506963/2194601472 blocksaround 50% of the disk is not even used. So statistically you loose around 20MB of data if you stop now. But there is no guarantee at all that that 20MB can be recovered if you continue. In theory, if you save the logfile, you can continue where you stopped. That's the purpose of the logfile. But shutting down the old disk might change things a bit.If your bitcoin wallet worth a million Euros is on that disk, I'd continue now. In most of the other cases I'd save the logfile in case there appears to be a major blocking filesystem error, and call it a day.
0 -
Haha, thanks for your input!I'll be away for a couple of days now, but what would be the next step?
- Mount the new disk together with the other two working disks. And then reboot the NAS? Are there any specific commands etc that's of interest at this stage?0 -
what would be the next step?
First put the 3 disks (the 2 old good ones, and the new copy) in the NAS and boot it. It won't hurt, and you'll never know.
If the volume doesn't come up, you'll have to examine the raid headers, and rebuild the array correspondingly, as you did at the beginning of this thread.
0 -
I've inserted the 2 old good disks together with the new copy and rebooted the NAS. It starts beeping and when opening the WUI it says the RAID is crashed/Full.And when examining the status of the array;~ # mdadm --examine /dev/sd[abcd]3
/dev/sda3:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : 555ccb7e:e9b29adc:2b39eea0:9329542f
Name : NAS542:2 (local to host NAS542)
Creation Time : Wed Oct 5 13:17:25 2022
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 4
Avail Dev Size : 5852270592 (2790.58 GiB 2996.36 GB)
Array Size : 8778405312 (8371.74 GiB 8989.09 GB)
Used Dev Size : 5852270208 (2790.58 GiB 2996.36 GB)
Data Offset : 262144 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : clean
Device UUID : 3e046eeb:3bac7e38:2c4e2408:d05d7a1d
Update Time : Mon Nov 7 09:55:23 2022
Checksum : 602ee45 - correct
Events : 37
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Device Role : Active device 3
Array State : .AAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
/dev/sdb3:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : 555ccb7e:e9b29adc:2b39eea0:9329542f
Name : NAS542:2 (local to host NAS542)
Creation Time : Wed Oct 5 13:17:25 2022
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 4
Avail Dev Size : 5852270592 (2790.58 GiB 2996.36 GB)
Array Size : 8778405312 (8371.74 GiB 8989.09 GB)
Used Dev Size : 5852270208 (2790.58 GiB 2996.36 GB)
Data Offset : 262144 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : clean
Device UUID : f7c083fd:fe37f383:55424937:52ec4bd2
Update Time : Mon Nov 7 09:55:23 2022
Checksum : 4783b96b - correct
Events : 37
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Device Role : Active device 1
Array State : .AAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
/dev/sdc3:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : 555ccb7e:e9b29adc:2b39eea0:9329542f
Name : NAS542:2 (local to host NAS542)
Creation Time : Wed Oct 5 13:17:25 2022
Raid Level : raid5
Raid Devices : 4
Avail Dev Size : 5852270592 (2790.58 GiB 2996.36 GB)
Array Size : 8778405312 (8371.74 GiB 8989.09 GB)
Used Dev Size : 5852270208 (2790.58 GiB 2996.36 GB)
Data Offset : 262144 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : clean
Device UUID : 803b4d20:57570076:2d7c62d1:e4bf567a
Update Time : Mon Nov 7 09:55:23 2022
Checksum : 9e7e60b7 - correct
Events : 37
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Device Role : Active device 2
Array State : .AAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
mdadm: cannot open /dev/sdd3: No such device or addressand~ # cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md2 : active raid5 sdb3[1] sda3[3] sdc3[2]
8778405312 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3] [_UUU]
md1 : active raid1 sdb2[6] sda2[4] sdc2[2]
1998784 blocks super 1.2 [4/3] [U_UU]
md0 : active raid1 sdc1[5] sdb1[4] sda1[6]
1997760 blocks super 1.2 [4/3] [UUU_]
unused devices: <none>Would the same three commands work now as well?su
mdadm --stop /dev/md2
mdadm --create --assume-clean --level=5 --raid-devices=4 --metadata=1.2 --chunk=64K --layout=left-symmetric /dev/md2 missing /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdd3 /dev/sdc3 && e2fsck /dev/md2
0 -
According to /proc/mdstat the array is assembled and up. So recreating the array shouldn't do much. What happens if you just try to mount it?
0 -
Hmm... are we back at square 1?Tried to mount~ # mkdir -p /tmp/mountpoint
~ # mount /dev/md2 /tmp/mountpoint
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md2,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so.
tried that command and looked at the last row[ 533.041160] EXT4-fs (md2): bad geometry: block count 2194601472 exceeds size of device (2194601328 blocks)tried to resize (according to your previous comment)~ # resize2fs /dev/md2
resize2fs 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014)
The filesystem can be resize to 2194601328 blocks.chk_expansible=0
Resizing the filesystem on /dev/md2 to 2194601328 (4k) blocks.
resize2fs: Can't read a block bitmap while trying to resize /dev/md2
Please run 'e2fsck -fy /dev/md2' to fix the filesystem
after the aborted resize operation.and tried to run that command~ # e2fsck -fy /dev/md2
e2fsck 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014)
e2fsck: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read while trying to open /dev/md2
Could this be a zero-length partition?
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 415 Beta Program
- 2.3K Nebula
- 142 Nebula Ideas
- 94 Nebula Status and Incidents
- 5.6K Security
- 230 USG FLEX H Series
- 267 Security Ideas
- 1.4K Switch
- 71 Switch Ideas
- 1K Wireless
- 39 Wireless Ideas
- 6.3K Consumer Product
- 246 Service & License
- 385 News and Release
- 82 Security Advisories
- 28 Education Center
- 9 [Campaign] Zyxel Network Detective
- 3.2K FAQ
- 34 Documents
- 34 Nebula Monthly Express
- 83 About Community
- 71 Security Highlight